5 Best Browshot Alternatives For Scaling The Screenshot
If you’ve ever tried scaling screenshot workloads, you know how tricky it can get. One project turns into a dozen, and suddenly your screenshot tool has to handle hundreds of requests, across different devices, browsers, and conditions all while staying accurate, quick, and reliable.
That’s where having the right screenshot API makes all the difference.
If you or your team are already using Browshot and thinking about leveling or switching up, or if you’re exploring your options before committing to a plan, it helps to know what separates a good screenshot API from a great one.
A strong API should tick a few key boxes:
✅ Reliability - so you can trust every capture without getting blocked.
✅ Fidelity - pages look exactly as intended.
✅ Speed - because waiting slows everything down.
✅ Useful features - that fit neatly into your workflow.
✅ Fair pricing - because it will grow with your needs.
✅ Scalability - lets you focus on building, & not maintaining your infrastructure.
In this guide, we’ve compared five reliable alternatives to Browshot. Each tool brings its own strength and qualities. There are trade-offs, of course, but our goal here is to help you find the one that best fits your automation setup and budget.
If you’re considering a switch or starting from scratch, this comparison will give you a clear picture of what’s out there so you can pick confidently.
1. CaptureKit
CaptureKit Screenshot API is built for scale and refined by the WebAPI Group (a software company), known for reliable, developer-first infrastructure tools. Since its acquisition, it has gained stronger scaling, improved rendering consistency, and a smoother developer experience that is helping teams capture high-quality screenshots without friction.
It’s designed for teams that need reliability under pressure. CaptureKit handles everything from automated reporting to large-scale monitoring with the same focus on accuracy and uptime. Developers appreciate its clear documentation, straightforward setup, and minimal maintenance. Everything about it feels engineered for stability, you set it up once, and get your screenshots taken effortlessly, without breaks.
Features
Full-page and viewport screenshots with custom dimensions
Device emulation (mobile, tablet, desktop)
Ad, cookie banner, and overlay removal
High-resolution and retina display support
Built-in caching, optional S3 export, and CDN caching
Auto-scaling infrastructure with 99.9% uptime and enterprise-grade support
Pricing
Free trial available with 100 credit
Starting price: $7/month (or equivalent; this is CaptureKit’s base rate for early volume)
Scale / Enterprise pricing: custom / negotiable for high volume usage
Pros
Balanced, production-ready feature set
Clean API design that’s easy to integrate
High reliability across workloads
Excellent cleanup control for screenshots (ads, overlays, banners)
Cons
Plugin ecosystem still developing
2. Urlbox
Urlbox Screenshot API known for its precision and flexibility. It’s often used by design teams, QA engineers, and enterprise developers who need full control over how web pages are rendered and captured. Urlbox has built a reputation for reliability and detailed customization from injecting JavaScript to hiding elements before a capture, it’s built for those who want exact results.
If you’re already using Urlbox or exploring alternatives, we’ve put together a detailed comparison. Check out our blog on the best Urlbox screenshot API.
Features
100+ browser rendering options (custom JS, hide elements, etc.)
Full-page captures, PDF output, metadata, and HTML output
Webhooks, S3 integration, and other enterprise capabilities
Pricing
Lo-Fi plan: $19/month for 2,000 renders, 30 RPM, and basic thumbnails
Hi-Fi, Ultra, and Enterprise tiers offer higher render volumes and concurrency
Pros
Mature and stable API with extensive customization
Strong community and long track record
Cons
Entry plans can feel expensive for growing teams
Advanced features available only in higher tiers
Support for custom requests can be slower at times
3. ScreenshotOne
ScreenshotOne is a modern screenshot API focused on clean, consistent captures and developer-friendly simplicity. It’s built to handle automation at scale while keeping screenshots sharp and free from distractions like cookie popups and ads. Its modular blocking system relies on a large database of more than 50,000 rules to remove common overlays automatically. The platform processes over a million screenshots every month and maintains high uptime, backed by responsive support and active development.
This is also an affordable and reliable option as Caputurekit. If you’d like a side-by-side breakdown, you can read our detailed comparison on ScreenshotOne vs CaptureKit.
Features
One-call screenshot API with automatic handling of corner cases
Intelligent ad and cookie banner removal powered by heuristic rules
Streamlined parameter model for fast, simple setup
Pricing
Plans start at around $9/month, with higher tiers available for increased volume and concurrency.
Pros
Clean and reliable screenshot output
Effective banner and ad blocking engine
Straightforward API ideal for developers
Strong uptime and responsive support
Cons
Advanced features (e.g., video rendering, IP location) available only in higher tiers
Fewer third-party integrations compared to older APIs
4. ScreenshotAPI
ScreenshotAPI is a versatile, scalable screenshot API known for its sharp HD and retina captures. It’s built for developers who need flexibility in output formats and consistent rendering across different browsers. The API supports complex pages, including single-page apps and sites using heavy animations or web fonts. It’s also widely used in automation, reporting, and product testing, thanks to its simple structure and stable performance.
If you’re caught between the two and can’t decide which one fits your workflow better, our detailed guide on CaptureKit vs ScreenshotAPI
Features
Supports WebP, JPEG, PNG, and PDF formats
Handles full-page, lazy-load, and scroll-to-element captures
HD and retina output (@2× / @3×) for high-fidelity visuals
Compatible with videos, web fonts, and single-page applications
Pricing
You can start with 100 free screenshots, then move to paid plans starting at around $9/month for moderate usage. Enterprise tiers are available for larger operations requiring dedicated resources or higher throughput.
Pros
Strong feature coverage with flexible format support
Solid scaling track record (1M+ screenshots delivered)
Simple API structure and easy documentation
Cons
Performance may dip slightly at very high concurrency
Lacks some advanced rendering tweaks found in Urlbox
Premium features often reserved for higher-tier plans
5. API Flash
APIFlash is a Chrome-based screenshot API built on AWS Lambda. It is designed to offer a mix of scalability and cost efficiency. It uses up-to-date Chrome rendering engines to produce pixel-accurate screenshots that support modern web features. Its serverless infrastructure allows for smooth scaling under heavy workloads while keeping operating costs low.
This makes APIFlash a practical choice for developers who need dependable screenshots without managing their own rendering systems.
Features
Chrome-based rendering engine for accurate, modern captures
Full-page and responsive viewport control with device emulation
Hide banners and ads automatically during capture
Auto page-load detection for precise timing
S3 export, HTTPS endpoints, and simple parameter control
Pricing
Free plan: 100 screenshots per month
Lite: about $7/month for 1,000 screenshots
Medium: about $35/month for 10,000 screenshots
Enterprise plans available for higher-volume or custom workloads
Pros
Strong cost-to-feature ratio for moderate workloads
Straightforward API with solid documentation
Scalable, reliable AWS Lambda-based architecture
Cons
Limited advanced rendering options
No PDF export in standard plans (PNG, JPEG, and WebP only)
May require enterprise setup for very large-scale use
Final Thoughts
Each of these screenshot APIs brings something different to the table from customization depth to cost efficiency and scalability. The best way to find what fits your workflow is to test them yourself. Most offer a free trial or credits to get started, so you can see how they handle your real workloads before committing to a plan.
If you’re exploring options, start with CaptureKit’s free plan. It’s quick to set up, no credit card needed, and scales easily as your usage grows. You can upgrade whenever your projects demand more.
CaptureKit also connects effortlessly with no-code automation platforms like Make and Zapier, letting you generate and store screenshots automatically without writing any code. If you’re curious about automating tasks this way, these tutorials are a good place to start:
You can also explore CaptureKit’s full range of use cases, including website monitoring, SEO tracking, and dashboard reports.